The First File The First File
  • News & Cases
  • Federal Law
    • Taxes
    • Federal Courts & Procedure
      • Appeals
      • Civil Procedure
      • Criminal Procedure
      • Evidence
    • Constitution & Rights
    • Consumer Protection
    • Bankruptcy
    • Agencies & Administrative Law
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Health & Federal Benefits
  • State Law
    • Criminal Law & Procedure
    • Employment & Work
      • Unemployment Insurance
      • Wages & Pay
        • Minimum Wage & Local Rules
      • Workers’ Compensation
      • Workplace Rights
    • Family & Relationships
      • Divorce
      • Guardianship
      • Probate & Estates
    • Housing & Real Estate
      • Landlord–Tenant
      • Foreclosure
      • HOAs & Condominiums
      • Deeds & Property Records
    • Personal Injury & Torts
      • Auto Accidents
      • Negligence
    • Business & Contracts
      • Business Entities
      • Contracts
    • Money, Debt & Consumer
      • Consumer Protection
      • Debt Collection & Judgments
Reading: How a 2010 DOJ announcement framed the DOL and ABA joint program
Share
FIRST FILEFIRST FILE
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Federal Law
    • Constitution & Rights
    • Consumer Protection
    • Practice Areas
  • State Law
    • Criminal Law & Procedure
    • Employment & Work
    • Family & Relationships
    • Housing & Real Estate
    • Personal Injury & Torts
    • Money, Debt & Consumer
    • Business & Contracts
  • Legal Terms Glossary
Follow US
Copyright © 2014-2025 Ruby Theme Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Home » Blog » How a 2010 DOJ announcement framed the DOL and ABA joint program
Archives

How a 2010 DOJ announcement framed the DOL and ABA joint program

By Lucas S.
Last updated: May 22, 2026
10 Min Read
SHARE

The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. Laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction and change frequently; always consult with a qualified professional regarding your specific situation. The author and publisher assume no liability for any actions taken based on this information.

Key Facts
  1. Federal level: In November 2010, the U.S. Department of Justice announced joint access-to-justice initiatives co-hosted by the Attorney General and the Vice President.
  2. Federal level: The 2010 announcement described a collaboration between the Department of Labor and the American Bar Association to help resolve Wage and Hour Division complaints.
  3. Federal level: The announcement said that beginning December 13, 2010, limited-capacity Wage and Hour complainants would receive a toll-free connection to an ABA-approved attorney referral provider when participating attorneys were available.
  4. Federal level: The announcement stated that if DOL conducted an investigation, complainants would receive information about findings, including violations at issue and any back wages owed, for use with an attorney who may take the case.
  5. National overview: The FLSA provides minimum wage and overtime requirements, and DOL’s summary notes that many states also have minimum wage laws and that higher state minimum wages can apply when both apply.
  6. Federal level: The FLSA overtime rule requires overtime pay after 40 hours in a workweek at not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay.
  7. Federal level: The FMLA provides job-protected leave for eligible employees, including up to 12 workweeks in a 12-month period and up to 26 workweeks for military caregiver leave in qualifying situations.

Last reviewed: May 2026. Legal rules, forms, deadlines, and procedures can change by jurisdiction, agency, and court system.

Contents
  • The historical item what the 2010 DOJ announcement said about the DOL and ABA collaboration
  • How the 2010 announcement relates to current federal workplace rules
  • A compact distinction for archive recovery announcements vs. entitlements
  • Other pieces in the same 2010 access to justice framing
  • What this archive item does not confirm about current operations
  • Sources

In November 2010, the Department of Justice (DOJ) framed several federal initiatives under an “access to justice” theme that included workplace legal-help outreach. One piece of that framing focused on a DOL and American Bar Association (ABA) collaboration intended to improve access to legal resources connected to certain DOL Wage and Hour Division complaint categories.

The historical item what the 2010 DOJ announcement said about the DOL and ABA collaboration

DOJ described a collaboration between the Department of Labor and the ABA intended to help workers resolve complaints received by DOL’s Wage and Hour Division. DOJ’s examples included complaints about not getting paid the minimum wage, not being paid overtime, and being denied family medical leave, as described in the 2010 DOJ announcement on access to legal services.

DOJ also described how the collaboration would provide an additional connection for limited-capacity situations. The announcement said that beginning December 13, 2010, complainants whose Wage and Hour cases could not be resolved by DOL because of limited capacity would receive a toll-free number to a newly created system that connected them to an ABA-approved attorney referral provider when there were participating attorneys in their area. The archived announcement text used in the evidence reviewed here did not include the specific toll-free number or the system name, so those identifiers cannot be reproduced reliably from this archive recovery record.

In addition, DOJ described information-sharing tied to the DOL complaint process. DOJ stated that if DOL conducted an investigation, the complainant would be given information about the findings, including the violations at issue and any back wages owed, for use with an attorney who may take the case. DOJ also stated that DOL developed a special process for complainants and representing attorneys to obtain relevant case information and documents when available.

How the 2010 announcement relates to current federal workplace rules

The DOL and ABA collaboration described by DOJ targeted the kind of wage-and-leave issues that map to two core federal workplace-rights frameworks: the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). DOJ framed the partnership as an access-to-legal-resources effort connected to the DOL Wage and Hour complaint categories it named, rather than as a substitute for the statutes themselves.

The FLSA sets minimum wage and overtime concepts. DOL’s WHD summary explains that overtime pay at not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay is required after 40 hours of work in a workweek, and it also notes that many states have minimum wage laws and that when both state and federal minimum wage rules apply, the employee is entitled to the higher minimum wage, as described in the FLSA minimum wage and overtime summary from DOL.

The FMLA provides job-protected leave for qualifying family and medical reasons. DOL’s WHD summary states that an eligible employee may take up to 12 workweeks of leave in a 12-month period and may have up to 26 workweeks for military caregiver leave under certain circumstances, as described in the FMLA job-protected leave summary from DOL.

A compact distinction for archive recovery announcements vs. entitlements

A DOJ announcement about access to legal resources does not, by itself, redefine the underlying wage-and-leave entitlements. For archive recovery, that distinction matters: the 2010 press-release framing explains what DOJ said about a time-bounded connection mechanism for certain Wage and Hour complaints, while the FLSA and FMLA descriptions reflect the federal baseline for the workplace rights those complaint categories reference.

Topic area What the 2010 DOJ announcement addressed What controls the workplace entitlement framework today (from the cited DOL summaries)
Wages and overtime Access-related collaboration for certain Wage and Hour Division complaints, including limited-capacity connections via ABA-approved referral FLSA wage-and-overtime concepts, including overtime after 40 hours at not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay
Family medical leave Access-related collaboration for complaints described as including denied family medical leave FMLA job-protected leave concepts, including up to 12 workweeks in a 12-month period and up to 26 workweeks for military caregiver leave in qualifying situations

Other pieces in the same 2010 access to justice framing

The DOJ announcement also described a wider access-to-justice posture. DOJ referenced its Office for Access to Justice mission language around “equal justice under law” in the broader access-to-justice framing, as described in the Office for Access to Justice mission language. DOJ also referenced foreclosure mediation strategies supported through access-to-justice work, including a DOJ/HUD referenced PDF on effective foreclosure mediation program strategies, linked in Foreclosure mediation strategies referenced by DOJ.

Separately from the foreclosure mediation framing, the Federal Trade Commission issued its own consumer-protection action for mortgage relief scams in the same general late-2010 period. The FTC’s archived announcement described a Mortgage Assistance Relief Services (MARS) Rule with an “advance fee ban,” stating that most provisions became effective December 29, 2010 and that the advance-fee ban provisions became effective January 31, 2011, as described in the FTC MARS Rule advance fee ban and effective dates.

The DOJ announcement further described veterans outreach that involved the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Legal Services Corporation (LSC). DOJ stated that the first phase of an awareness campaign was already underway and described LSC-funded programs reaching out to 51 Vet Centers across the mid-Atlantic region, Maine, and Arkansas to share information about legal services and create referral systems.

What this archive item does not confirm about current operations

This archive recovery record does not establish whether the specific toll-free connection mechanism described in the 2010 DOJ announcement continued, changed names, or ended later. The evidence used here supports the existence of the announced December 13, 2010 start date and the limited-capacity connection concept, but it does not include a current DOL or ABA page confirming what that system later became or whether it remained in operation.

Related archive reporting on access-to-justice efforts tied to the legal profession provides additional theme continuity: archived reporting on access to justice efforts tied to the legal profession.

Sources

  • 2010 DOJ announcement on access to legal services
  • Office for Access to Justice mission language
  • Foreclosure mediation strategies referenced by DOJ
  • FTC MARS Rule advance fee ban and effective dates
  • FLSA minimum wage and overtime summary from DOL
  • FMLA job-protected leave summary from DOL

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByLucas S.
Follow:
I am an independent writer and researcher with a deep interest in law, public affairs, and how the U.S. legal system operates in the real world. Regarding the key facts about my work, my role consists of providing plain-English legal explanations and covering various lawsuits and legal disputes. My approach involves preparing articles using the primary sources listed on each page. I am not an attorney or a lawyer and I do not provide legal advice. The primary areas where I focus my research include explaining complex legal topics in plain English, translating official legal materials into accessible explanations, and following current lawsuits and court cases. You should consult a qualified professional for advice regarding your own situation.
Previous Article Understanding the ABA v. FTC oral argument and the Red Flags creditor change
Next Article What ABA accreditation of foreign law schools means under federal and state rules
Most Popular
An unpaved road curves through a sunlit high-desert landscape toward two distant red-rock buttes.
Patagonia coalition asks court to revive Bears Ears challenge after Trump reduction
September 3, 2026
A broad daylight street view of a modern courthouse with palm trees, entrance steps, traffic lights and a few distant pedestrians.
Duane Davis Convicted in Tupac Shakur Murder Case: What the Verdict Decides
September 3, 2026
The White House stands beside fenced construction sites, cranes and partially built concrete structures in daylight.
Supreme Court Lets White House Ballroom Work Continue Without Deciding Its Legality
September 3, 2026
Pedestrians walk near the entrance of a modern federal courthouse complex in daylight.
Music Publishers Sue Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Thousands of Compositions
September 3, 2026
Pedestrians pass a large stone courthouse with tall windows and mature trees along an urban street.
FTC and 22 States Sue Amazon Over Sponsored Ads Pricing
September 1, 2026

You Might Also Like

FDIC insurance coverage for IOLTA and noninterest accounts explained

10 Min Read

ABA accreditation and foreign law schools remain a major point of confusion in 2026

10 Min Read

How 2010 ABA policy reporting connected federal preemption of state tort law to civil right to counsel and judicial training

12 Min Read

What the ABA Midyear Meeting 2013 archive shows

12 Min Read

Always Stay Up to Date

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
The First File The First File

Our goal is to provide simple explanations of federal and state laws without the confusing jargon

Latest News

  • Federal Law
  • State Law
  • Legal Terms Glossary

Resouce

  • Business Contact Page
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editoral Policy
  • About
  • Sitemap

Legal Notice

The information on this website is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?