The information below explains general legal concepts for educational purposes. It is not legal, financial, or tax advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and procedures vary by jurisdiction and may change. The author and publisher disclaim liability for actions taken based on this content.
Key Facts
- Federal level: The ABA Medal is described as being presented at the ABA Annual Meeting to a member of the bench or bar who has rendered conspicuous service in the cause of American jurisprudence.
- Federal level: ABA Journal reported that David Boies and Theodore B. Olson were honored with the ABA Medal by the House of Delegates on August 8, 2011.
- Federal level: ABA Journal described Boies and Olson as co-chairs of the ABA Task Force on Preservation of the Justice System.
- Federal level: ABA Journal described the ABA Medal as the ABA’s highest award when reporting on the 2011 honors.
- State level: ABA Journal linked the 2011 recognition to representation of California couples precluded from marrying because of Proposition 8, which it described as eliminating the right of same sex couples to marry in California.
- National overview: ABA Journal described the Medal story as tied to later work resolving a labor dispute between the NFL owners and players.
An archive recovery of the ABA Medal announcement for 2011
This archive recovery explains an ABA Medal 2011 announcement naming David Boies and Theodore B. Olson as recipients, based on what the ABA describes the Medal to recognize and what contemporaneous reporting said about the 2011 honors.
- An archive recovery of the ABA Medal announcement for 2011
- What the American Bar Association Medal is intended to recognize
- ABA Journal reporting of the 2011 recipients
- The matters ABA tied to Boies and Olson’s joint work
- How an award announcement fits legal history without acting like a ruling
- Placing this 2011 item within the Archives section
- Bottom line from the 2011 Medal coverage
- Sources
What the American Bar Association Medal is intended to recognize
The ABA describes the ABA Medal as an award presented at the ABA Annual Meeting to a member of the bench or bar who has rendered conspicuous service in the cause of American jurisprudence (ABA Medal).
That framing matters for historical context because it describes the Medal as a professional recognition tied to “American jurisprudence,” not as a specific court order or statute.
ABA Journal reporting of the 2011 recipients
Contemporaneous ABA Journal reporting stated that David Boies and Theodore B. Olson were honored with the ABA’s highest award, the ABA Medal, by the House of Delegates on August 8, 2011 (Sometime-Foes Boies and Olson Honored with ABA Medal for Successful Joint Efforts).
The same reporting described Boies and Olson as co-chairs of the ABA Task Force on Preservation of the Justice System at the time of the recognition.
The matters ABA tied to Boies and Olson’s joint work
ABA Journal reporting tied the 2011 recognition in part to the recipients’ representation of California couples precluded from marrying because of Proposition 8 and described Proposition 8 as eliminating the right of same sex couples to marry in California (Sometime-Foes Boies and Olson Honored with ABA Medal for Successful Joint Efforts).
The same story also described the recipients as having worked together to help resolve a labor dispute between NFL owners and players.
In that sense, the archive record presents the 2011 Medal narrative as spanning multiple legal and policy dispute contexts, with ABA Journal framing the work as successful joint efforts.
How an award announcement fits legal history without acting like a ruling
A reader confusion common to prominent legal awards is treating the recognition as if it directly drives legal outcomes. The ABA Medal’s own description places the award in the category of professional recognition presented at the ABA Annual Meeting (ABA Medal).
At the same time, the 2011 reporting illustrates why the announcement drew attention: ABA Journal connected the recognition to matters it described in the context of the recipients’ work, including Proposition 8 related marriage-access litigation and an NFL labor dispute.
Taken together, the historical value of the 2011 Medal coverage is as a record of how the ABA and the legal press described “conspicuous service” in “American jurisprudence,” not as a substitute for judicial decisions or legislation.
What each source contributes in this archive recovery
This compact comparison shows how the evidence maps to the article’s claims.
| Source in this recovery | What it provides | Main use in the article |
|---|---|---|
| ABA Medal description page | Defines the ABA Medal’s Annual Meeting presentation and service framing | Explains what the award is intended to recognize (ABA Medal) |
| ABA Journal story dated August 8, 2011 | Identifies Boies and Olson as recipients and summarizes matters tied to the recognition | Establishes the 2011 recipients and the Proposition 8 and NFL labor dispute context (Sometime-Foes Boies and Olson Honored with ABA Medal for Successful Joint Efforts) |
Placing this 2011 item within the Archives section
The treatment here keeps the focus on recognition and description within an archive recovery frame. It does not treat the Medal announcement as a mechanism that changes substantive federal or state law.
For readers comparing other ABA honors in the Archives, a related example is 2006 ABA Medal recovery.
Bottom line from the 2011 Medal coverage
In the 2011 Medal story reconstructed here, ABA Journal reporting identified David Boies and Theodore B. Olson as co-recipients of the ABA Medal and connected the recognition to joint efforts that included work described in relation to Proposition 8 marriage-access litigation and a later labor dispute between NFL owners and players.
Against the ABA’s own award description, the historical takeaway is that the ABA Medal functioned as an institutional recognition of conspicuous service in the cause of American jurisprudence, presented at the ABA Annual Meeting.