The First File The First File
  • News & Cases
  • Federal Law
    • Taxes
    • Federal Courts & Procedure
      • Appeals
      • Civil Procedure
      • Criminal Procedure
      • Evidence
    • Constitution & Rights
    • Consumer Protection
    • Bankruptcy
    • Agencies & Administrative Law
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Health & Federal Benefits
  • State Law
    • Criminal Law & Procedure
    • Employment & Work
      • Unemployment Insurance
      • Wages & Pay
        • Minimum Wage & Local Rules
      • Workers’ Compensation
      • Workplace Rights
    • Family & Relationships
      • Divorce
      • Guardianship
      • Probate & Estates
    • Housing & Real Estate
      • Landlord–Tenant
      • Foreclosure
      • HOAs & Condominiums
      • Deeds & Property Records
    • Personal Injury & Torts
      • Auto Accidents
      • Negligence
    • Business & Contracts
      • Business Entities
      • Contracts
    • Money, Debt & Consumer
      • Consumer Protection
      • Debt Collection & Judgments
Reading: The American Bar Association and the Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013
Share
FIRST FILEFIRST FILE
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Federal Law
    • Constitution & Rights
    • Consumer Protection
    • Practice Areas
  • State Law
    • Criminal Law & Procedure
    • Employment & Work
    • Family & Relationships
    • Housing & Real Estate
    • Personal Injury & Torts
    • Money, Debt & Consumer
    • Business & Contracts
  • Legal Terms Glossary
Follow US
Copyright © 2014-2025 Ruby Theme Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Home » Blog » The American Bar Association and the Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013
Archives

The American Bar Association and the Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013

By Lucas S.
Last updated: June 7, 2026
6 Min Read
SHARE

This material is general public information for educational purposes only. It should not be used as legal, financial, or tax advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading it. Federal, state, and local rules may vary and may change over time. A qualified professional can review specific circumstances.

Key Facts
  1. Federal level: The Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013 was introduced to amend the federal criminal code to explicitly prohibit the trafficking of firearms.
  2. Federal level: In January 2013, the American Bar Association formally supported the legislation in an effort to increase penalties for evading background checks.
  3. Federal level: The American Bar Association cited federal data identifying straw purchases as the most significant factor in illegal firearms trafficking.
  4. Federal level: The 2013 legislation ultimately did not pass into law, functioning instead as a historical policy proposal.
  5. Federal level: In 2022, Congress addressed the issues raised in 2013 by enacting the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.
  6. Federal level: Modern federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 932 explicitly outlaws the straw purchasing of firearms.
  7. Federal level: Trafficking in firearms is now expressly penalized as a distinct federal offense under 18 U.S.C. § 933.
  8. National overview: While federal statutes govern interstate trafficking, individual state laws operate independently to regulate in-state firearm transfers.

Last reviewed: May 2026. Legal rules, forms, deadlines, and procedures can change by jurisdiction, agency, and court system.

Contents
  • The American Bar Association’s 2013 Advocacy
  • From Policy Proposal to Modern Federal Law
  • Federal Authority and State Independence
  • Sources

In early 2013, federal lawmakers introduced the Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013. The proposed legislation sought to amend the federal criminal code to expressly penalize the trafficking of firearms and the act of straw purchasing. At the time, federal authorities relied on a patchwork of existing laws to prosecute individuals who diverted weapons into illegal markets.

The American Bar Association’s 2013 Advocacy

Following the introduction of the bill in the Senate as S.179, the American Bar Association formally announced its support for the legislation. In a letter to the bill’s sponsors, the leadership of the American Bar Association expressed that increasing penalties for those who help others evade background checks would serve public safety and strengthen the criminal justice system.

A central focus of the American Bar Association’s advocacy was the practice of straw purchasing, which occurs when a person buys a weapon on behalf of someone legally prohibited from obtaining one. The organization highlighted findings from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) regarding the scale of the issue. According to the data cited by the American Bar Association at the time, the ATF identified straw purchases as the single most significant factor in illegal gun trafficking, accounting for nearly a third of all firearms involved in federal trafficking investigations.

From Policy Proposal to Modern Federal Law

The Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013 served as a historical legislative proposal rather than an enacted law. The bill did not pass the 113th Congress. However, the legal gaps identified by the American Bar Association and federal lawmakers in 2013 were largely addressed nearly a decade later when Congress passed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act in 2022.

Modern federal law now explicitly prohibits the straw purchasing of firearms. Under 18 U.S.C. § 932), it is a federal crime for any person to knowingly purchase a firearm on behalf of someone else while knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe, that the recipient intends to use the firearm in furtherance of a felony.

Additionally, the modern federal framework establishes direct penalties for firearms trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 933. This statute makes it unlawful to ship, transport, or transfer a firearm to another person if the sender knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the recipient’s possession of the weapon constitutes a felony offense.

Federal Authority and State Independence

The federal statutes enforced by the Department of Justice operate alongside various state laws governing firearm transfers. While federal law provides a nationwide baseline prohibition against criminal trafficking and straw purchasing across interstate commerce, specific regulations regarding private transfers, secondary market sales, and local background checks vary significantly by state.

The American Bar Association has consistently engaged with federal and state firearms policies throughout its history. Beyond the 2013 legislation, historical discussions have included organizational resolutions regarding firearms on private property and formal responses to Supreme Court decisions on gun control.

Sources

  • Gun Trafficking Prevention Act of 2013
  • formally announced its support for the legislation
  • 18 U.S.C. § 932
  • 18 U.S.C. § 933

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByLucas S.
Follow:
I am an independent writer and researcher with a deep interest in law, public affairs, and how the U.S. legal system operates in the real world. Regarding the key facts about my work, my role consists of providing plain-English legal explanations and covering various lawsuits and legal disputes. My approach involves preparing articles using the primary sources listed on each page. I am not an attorney or a lawyer and I do not provide legal advice. The primary areas where I focus my research include explaining complex legal topics in plain English, translating official legal materials into accessible explanations, and following current lawsuits and court cases. You should consult a qualified professional for advice regarding your own situation.
Previous Article Estate papers, house keys, and family photographs arranged for probate review Probated Meaning: What Happens When a Will Is Probated
Next Article ABA privilege for lawyers’ communications with in house counsel explained
Most Popular
An unpaved road curves through a sunlit high-desert landscape toward two distant red-rock buttes.
Patagonia coalition asks court to revive Bears Ears challenge after Trump reduction
September 3, 2026
A broad daylight street view of a modern courthouse with palm trees, entrance steps, traffic lights and a few distant pedestrians.
Duane Davis Convicted in Tupac Shakur Murder Case: What the Verdict Decides
September 3, 2026
The White House stands beside fenced construction sites, cranes and partially built concrete structures in daylight.
Supreme Court Lets White House Ballroom Work Continue Without Deciding Its Legality
September 3, 2026
Pedestrians walk near the entrance of a modern federal courthouse complex in daylight.
Music Publishers Sue Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Thousands of Compositions
September 3, 2026
Pedestrians pass a large stone courthouse with tall windows and mature trees along an urban street.
FTC and 22 States Sue Amazon Over Sponsored Ads Pricing
September 1, 2026

You Might Also Like

How 2012 AM105A fits into ABA Model Rules history and jurisdiction review

8 Min Read

How Affordable Care Act cost control and implementation work

11 Min Read

Civics education in 2026 is guided by state standards and a few federal laws

11 Min Read

Extraordinary Women Lawyers awards archive recovery of a 2009 ABA luncheon post

6 Min Read

Always Stay Up to Date

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
The First File The First File

Our goal is to provide simple explanations of federal and state laws without the confusing jargon

Latest News

  • Federal Law
  • State Law
  • Legal Terms Glossary

Resouce

  • Business Contact Page
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editoral Policy
  • About
  • Sitemap

Legal Notice

The information on this website is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?