The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. Laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction and change frequently; always consult with a qualified professional regarding your specific situation. The author and publisher assume no liability for any actions taken based on this information.
- The 2013AM102 identifier appears in a Health Canada incident report record
- The incident report page shows a structured set of fields
- Product and exposure details are recorded as reported
- Animal health information can appear in domestic animal reports
- Some sections distinguish observations from opinions
- Reading a single incident report record has limits
- Sources
Key Facts
- Federal level: Health Canada’s Pesticide Product Information portal publishes incident report records with structured fields and narratives.
- Federal level: One portal record lists Incident Report Number 2013-3102 and Registrant Reference Number 2013AM102.
- Federal level: That record identifies the registrant as Bayer Inc and lists the product name as Advantage II.
- Federal level: The record lists active ingredients imidacloprid at 9.1% and pyriproxyfen at 0.46%.
- Federal level: The record lists the incident location country as the United States and lists the state as unknown.
- Federal level: The record is presented as a domestic animal incident report involving a cat.
- Federal level: The record reports an outcome of death and lists signs including ataxia and head tilt in the symptoms section.
- Federal level: The record includes a registrant narrative discussing whether the reported effects fit the product’s toxicological profile.
The 2013AM102 identifier appears in a Health Canada incident report record
One publicly available record on Health Canada’s Pesticide Product Information portal lists “Registrant Reference Number: 2013AM102” alongside “Incident Report Number: 2013-3102,” and the page is presented as an incident report document in a form-like layout.
The portal record can be viewed on the Health Canada incident report page for 2013-3102.
The incident report page shows a structured set of fields
Instead of reading like a narrative article, the record is divided into labeled sections that look like a standardized report, including general information, product description, application information, and a domestic animal incident report section.
Product and exposure details are recorded as reported
The record lists the product name as Advantage II and lists active ingredients as imidacloprid (9.1%) and pyriproxyfen (0.46%), with the formulation listed as liquid.
Several fields on the page show that incident report records can contain incomplete information, including entries marked “Unknown” for items such as application rate and the date the incident was first observed.
Animal health information can appear in domestic animal reports
In this record, the incident is presented as involving one cat, and the symptoms section includes neurological signs such as ataxia and head tilt, with the outcome reported as “Died.”
The narrative portion on the page also includes background details about the animal’s reported health history and the veterinary care described in the report.
Some sections distinguish observations from opinions
The record includes fields that explicitly use evaluative wording, such as “In your opinion, was the product used according to the label instructions,” and it also includes a severity classification field.
Separately, the narrative text includes the registrant’s discussion of whether the reported signs and fatal outcome were consistent with the product’s toxicological profile, which shows that incident report records can include both reported observations and an assessment.
Reading a single incident report record has limits
This type of record is a snapshot of what was submitted and recorded in the portal fields, and it may include unknown values, competing explanations, and narrative summaries that reflect the information available to the reporter and registrant at the time.
In this record, the incident location is listed as the United States while the state is listed as unknown, which is an example of how geographic detail can be limited even when the country is identified.
