The First File The First File
  • News & Cases
  • Federal Law
    • Taxes
    • Federal Courts & Procedure
      • Appeals
      • Civil Procedure
      • Criminal Procedure
      • Evidence
    • Constitution & Rights
    • Consumer Protection
    • Bankruptcy
    • Agencies & Administrative Law
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Health & Federal Benefits
  • State Law
    • Criminal Law & Procedure
    • Employment & Work
      • Unemployment Insurance
      • Wages & Pay
        • Minimum Wage & Local Rules
      • Workers’ Compensation
      • Workplace Rights
    • Family & Relationships
      • Divorce
      • Guardianship
      • Probate & Estates
    • Housing & Real Estate
      • Landlord–Tenant
      • Foreclosure
      • HOAs & Condominiums
      • Deeds & Property Records
    • Personal Injury & Torts
      • Auto Accidents
      • Negligence
    • Business & Contracts
      • Business Entities
      • Contracts
    • Money, Debt & Consumer
      • Consumer Protection
      • Debt Collection & Judgments
Reading: What ABA Resolution 113B says about voting accessibility
Share
FIRST FILEFIRST FILE
Font ResizerAa
Search
  • Federal Law
    • Constitution & Rights
    • Consumer Protection
    • Practice Areas
  • State Law
    • Criminal Law & Procedure
    • Employment & Work
    • Family & Relationships
    • Housing & Real Estate
    • Personal Injury & Torts
    • Money, Debt & Consumer
    • Business & Contracts
  • Legal Terms Glossary
Follow US
Copyright © 2014-2025 Ruby Theme Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Home » Blog » What ABA Resolution 113B says about voting accessibility
Agencies & Administrative LawArchives

What ABA Resolution 113B says about voting accessibility

By Lucas S.
Last updated: August 15, 2026
5 Min Read
SHARE

The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or tax advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this content. Laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction and change frequently; always consult with a qualified professional regarding your specific situation. The author and publisher assume no liability for any actions taken based on this information.

Contents
  • ABA Resolution 113B is a policy statement adopted within the ABA
  • The text of Resolution 113B highlights accessibility across the voting process
  • The resolution refers to more than one level of government and more than one type of tribunal
  • The resolution names several types of barriers without listing a single technical standard
  • The ABA describes this type of resolution as part of its published policy materials
  • People sometimes confuse an ABA policy resolution with government law
  • Sources
Key Facts
  1. Federal and state: ABA Resolution 113B was passed by the ABA House of Delegates in 2014.
  2. Federal and state: Resolution 113B addresses accessibility in the electoral process, including voter registration and voting methods, for persons with disabilities.
  3. Federal and state: The resolution urges that polling places be free of physical, technological, and administrative barriers.
  4. Federal and state: The resolution urges improved enforcement of voting rights for persons with disabilities.
  5. Federal and state: The resolution urges that election personnel and volunteers receive accessibility training.
  6. Federal and state: The resolution urges that persons with disabilities be actively encouraged to serve as election officials and volunteers.
  7. Federal and state: An ABA article describes this resolution as the result of work by the ABA Standing Committee on Election Law and the ABA Commission on Disability Rights.

ABA Resolution 113B is a policy statement adopted within the ABA

Resolution 113B is a policy resolution adopted by the American Bar Association House of Delegates that speaks to voting accessibility for persons with disabilities, as described in an ABA publication by the Commission on Law and Aging.

The text of Resolution 113B highlights accessibility across the voting process

The ABA publication describes the resolution in three “resolved” clauses that focus on access to voting and election administration.

RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments and the courts to ensure that the electoral process, including voter registration and voting methods, is accessible to persons with disabilities and that polling places are free of physical, technological, and administrative barriers.

FURTHER RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments to use all appropriate means to improve enforcement of voting rights for persons with disabilities.

FURTHER RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges all election officials to ensure that election personnel and volunteers receive accessibility training and that persons with disabilities are actively encouraged to serve as election officials and volunteers.

The resolution refers to more than one level of government and more than one type of tribunal

Resolution 113B explicitly addresses “federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments and the courts,” which signals that voting access issues can arise across many different systems and authorities.

The resolution names several types of barriers without listing a single technical standard

Rather than focusing on one device or one administrative rule, the text highlights three broad categories of barriers that can affect access at polling places, described as physical, technological, and administrative barriers.

The ABA describes this type of resolution as part of its published policy materials

On its website, the ABA Commission on Disability Rights maintains a list of “resolutions passed by the ABA House of Delegates” that it describes as “ABA policy,” and it notes that many of the policies are presented as PDF files.

People sometimes confuse an ABA policy resolution with government law

In plain terms, Resolution 113B is presented by the ABA as an association policy position adopted through the House of Delegates, and it is written as an urging statement directed to governments, courts, and election officials rather than as a statute or regulation text.

Sources

  • American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging Bifocal article describing Resolution 113B
  • American Bar Association Commission on Disability Rights list of disability related ABA resolutions

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByLucas S.
Follow:
I am an independent writer and researcher with a deep interest in law, public affairs, and how the U.S. legal system operates in the real world. Regarding the key facts about my work, my role consists of providing plain-English legal explanations and covering various lawsuits and legal disputes. My approach involves preparing articles using the primary sources listed on each page. I am not an attorney or a lawyer and I do not provide legal advice. The primary areas where I focus my research include explaining complex legal topics in plain English, translating official legal materials into accessible explanations, and following current lawsuits and court cases. You should consult a qualified professional for advice regarding your own situation.
Previous Article ABA Resolution 113A explains concerns about so called panic defenses
Next Article Understanding the ABA Solo and Small Firm Lifetime Achievement Award
Most Popular
An unpaved road curves through a sunlit high-desert landscape toward two distant red-rock buttes.
Patagonia coalition asks court to revive Bears Ears challenge after Trump reduction
September 3, 2026
A broad daylight street view of a modern courthouse with palm trees, entrance steps, traffic lights and a few distant pedestrians.
Duane Davis Convicted in Tupac Shakur Murder Case: What the Verdict Decides
September 3, 2026
The White House stands beside fenced construction sites, cranes and partially built concrete structures in daylight.
Supreme Court Lets White House Ballroom Work Continue Without Deciding Its Legality
September 3, 2026
Pedestrians walk near the entrance of a modern federal courthouse complex in daylight.
Music Publishers Sue Anthropic Over Alleged Use of Thousands of Compositions
September 3, 2026
Pedestrians pass a large stone courthouse with tall windows and mature trees along an urban street.
FTC and 22 States Sue Amazon Over Sponsored Ads Pricing
September 1, 2026

You Might Also Like

Archive recovery for missing 2012mm101f legal history pages

6 Min Read

ABA House of Delegates and human trafficking at the 2013 Midyear Meeting

7 Min Read

The first ABA Stonewall Award in 2013 honored three LGBTQ advocates

5 Min Read

What a stay of execution meant in Warren Hill’s case and Laurel Bellows’s statement

7 Min Read

Always Stay Up to Date

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
The First File The First File

Our goal is to provide simple explanations of federal and state laws without the confusing jargon

Latest News

  • Federal Law
  • State Law
  • Legal Terms Glossary

Resouce

  • Business Contact Page
  • Corrections Policy
  • Editoral Policy
  • About
  • Sitemap

Legal Notice

The information on this website is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?